Verified Meta Data
Aerodactyl vs Froakie Battle Analysis icon

Aerodactyl vs Froakie Battle Analysis

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Performance Statistics

HP
80
41
Attack
105
56
Defense
65
40
Sp. Atk
60
62
Sp. Def
75
44
Speed
130
71
Total Stats
515
314

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

Aerodactyl
4★
Character Rarity
🌀
Rock
Type
📍
Kanto
Region
Froakie
4★
Character Rarity
🌀
Water
Type
📍
Kalos
Region
Battle Simulator v1.0

Win Probability

100%
0%
Aerodactyl Win Rate
Froakie Win Rate
Calculated based on base stats, type effectiveness, and 1,000 simulated battle rounds.

Head-to-Head Analysis

Aerodactyl has a higher Base Stat Total (515), giving it a general attribute advantage. Froakie may rely on specific type matchups or speed tiers to counter.

Competitive Analysis: Aerodactyl vs Froakie

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Aerodactyl and Froakie can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Aerodactyl brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Froakie. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Aerodactyl stronger than Froakie?

A: It depends on their roles. While Aerodactyl has higher base stats in some areas, Froakie might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Aerodactyl?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Aerodactyl performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2027-02-16

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2026-03-24

"The Aerodactyl vs Froakie Battle Analysis provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."