Verified Meta Data
Aerodactyl vs Morgrem: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Player 1
Aerodactyl
Kanto • Rock
Height1.8 m
Weight59 kg
VS
Player 2
Morgrem
Galar • Dark
Height0.8 m
Weight12.5 kg
Performance Statistics
Pokémon Attributes & Stats
4★
Character Rarity
Aerodactyl
4★
Character Rarity
Morgrem
Rock
Type
Aerodactyl
Dark
Type
Morgrem
Kanto
Region
Aerodactyl
Galar
Region
Morgrem
Head-to-Head Analysis
Aerodactyl has a higher Base Stat Total (515), giving it a general attribute advantage. Morgrem may rely on specific type matchups or speed tiers to counter.
Popular Variations (25)
Competitive Analysis: Aerodactyl vs Morgrem
In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Aerodactyl and Morgrem can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.📊 Stat Breakdown
Aerodactyl brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Morgrem. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is Aerodactyl stronger than Morgrem?
A: It depends on their roles. While Aerodactyl has higher base stats in some areas, Morgrem might have better type coverage or utility.
Q: What is the best type matchup for Aerodactyl?
A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Aerodactyl performs against different elements.
Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?
A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.
Explore More Tools
View All Tools →Bulbasaur vs Ivysaur: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Venusaur: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Charmander: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head