Verified Meta Data
Alakazam vs Hakamo O: Base Stats & Type Matchup icon

Alakazam vs Hakamo O: Base Stats & Type Matchup

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Player 1
Alakazam
Kanto • Psychic
Alakazam
Height1.5 m
Weight48 kg
VS
Player 2
Hakamo O
Alola • Dragon
Hakamo O
Height1.2 m
Weight47 kg

Performance Statistics

HP
55
55
Attack
50
75
Defense
45
90
Sp. Atk
135
65
Sp. Def
95
70
Speed
120
65
Total Stats
500
420

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

4★
Character Rarity
Alakazam
4★
Character Rarity
Hakamo O
🌀
Psychic
Type
Alakazam
🌀
Dragon
Type
Hakamo O
📍
Kanto
Region
Alakazam
📍
Alola
Region
Hakamo O

Head-to-Head Analysis

Alakazam has a higher Base Stat Total (500), giving it a general attribute advantage. Hakamo O may rely on specific type matchups or speed tiers to counter.

Competitive Analysis: Alakazam vs Hakamo O

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Alakazam and Hakamo O can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Alakazam brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Hakamo O. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Alakazam stronger than Hakamo O?

A: It depends on their roles. While Alakazam has higher base stats in some areas, Hakamo O might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Alakazam?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Alakazam performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2027-07-13

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2026-11-19

"The Alakazam vs Hakamo O: Base Stats & Type Matchup provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."