Verified Meta Data
Charizard vs Appletun Battle Analysis icon

Charizard vs Appletun Battle Analysis

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Performance Statistics

HP
78
110
Attack
84
85
Defense
78
80
Sp. Atk
109
100
Sp. Def
85
80
Speed
100
30
Total Stats
534
485

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

Charizard
4★
Character Rarity
🌀
Fire
Type
📍
Kanto
Region
Appletun
4★
Character Rarity
🌀
Grass
Type
📍
Galar
Region
Battle Simulator v1.0

Win Probability

100%
0%
Charizard Win Rate
Appletun Win Rate
Calculated based on base stats, type effectiveness, and 1,000 simulated battle rounds.

Head-to-Head Analysis

Charizard has a higher Base Stat Total (534), giving it a general attribute advantage. Appletun may rely on specific type matchups or speed tiers to counter.

Competitive Analysis: Charizard vs Appletun

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Charizard and Appletun can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Charizard brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Appletun. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Charizard stronger than Appletun?

A: It depends on their roles. While Charizard has higher base stats in some areas, Appletun might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Charizard?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Charizard performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2026-05-27

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2026-03-02

"The Charizard vs Appletun Battle Analysis provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."