Verified Meta Data
Charizard vs Ogerpon: Base Stats & Type Matchup icon

Charizard vs Ogerpon: Base Stats & Type Matchup

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Player 1
Charizard
Kanto • Fire
Charizard
Height1.7 m
Weight90.5 kg
VS
Player 2
Ogerpon
Paldea • Grass
Ogerpon
Height1.2 m
Weight39.8 kg

Performance Statistics

HP
78
80
Attack
84
120
Defense
78
84
Sp. Atk
109
60
Sp. Def
85
96
Speed
100
110
Total Stats
534
550

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

4★
Character Rarity
Charizard
4★
Character Rarity
Ogerpon
🌀
Fire
Type
Charizard
🌀
Grass
Type
Ogerpon
📍
Kanto
Region
Charizard
📍
Paldea
Region
Ogerpon

Head-to-Head Analysis

Ogerpon features superior base scaling with a total of 550. Charizard depends on strategic type advantages and unique abilities.

Competitive Analysis: Charizard vs Ogerpon

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Charizard and Ogerpon can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Charizard brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Ogerpon. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Charizard stronger than Ogerpon?

A: It depends on their roles. While Charizard has higher base stats in some areas, Ogerpon might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Charizard?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Charizard performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2028-02-02

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2026-03-01

"The Charizard vs Ogerpon: Base Stats & Type Matchup provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."