Verified Meta Data
Charmander vs Magnezone: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Player 1
Charmander
Kanto • Fire
Height0.6 m
Weight8.5 kg
VS
Player 2
Magnezone
Sinnoh • Electric
Height1.2 m
Weight180 kg
Performance Statistics
Pokémon Attributes & Stats
4★
Character Rarity
Charmander
4★
Character Rarity
Magnezone
Fire
Type
Charmander
Electric
Type
Magnezone
Kanto
Region
Charmander
Sinnoh
Region
Magnezone
Head-to-Head Analysis
Magnezone features superior base scaling with a total of 535. Charmander depends on strategic type advantages and unique abilities.
Popular Variations (30)
Competitive Analysis: Charmander vs Magnezone
In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Charmander and Magnezone can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.📊 Stat Breakdown
Charmander brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Magnezone. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is Charmander stronger than Magnezone?
A: It depends on their roles. While Charmander has higher base stats in some areas, Magnezone might have better type coverage or utility.
Q: What is the best type matchup for Charmander?
A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Charmander performs against different elements.
Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?
A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.
Explore More Tools
View All Tools →Bulbasaur vs Ivysaur: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Venusaur: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Charmander: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head