Verified Meta Data
Charmander vs Pelipper Battle Analysis icon

Charmander vs Pelipper Battle Analysis

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Performance Statistics

HP
39
60
Attack
52
50
Defense
43
100
Sp. Atk
60
95
Sp. Def
50
70
Speed
65
65
Total Stats
309
440

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

Charmander
4★
Character Rarity
🌀
Fire
Type
📍
Kanto
Region
Pelipper
4★
Character Rarity
🌀
Water
Type
📍
Hoenn
Region
Battle Simulator v1.0

Win Probability

0%
100%
Charmander Win Rate
Pelipper Win Rate
Calculated based on base stats, type effectiveness, and 1,000 simulated battle rounds.

Head-to-Head Analysis

Pelipper features superior base scaling with a total of 440. Charmander depends on strategic type advantages and unique abilities.

Competitive Analysis: Charmander vs Pelipper

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Charmander and Pelipper can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Charmander brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Pelipper. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Charmander stronger than Pelipper?

A: It depends on their roles. While Charmander has higher base stats in some areas, Pelipper might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Charmander?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Charmander performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2028-01-29

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2026-04-15

"The Charmander vs Pelipper Battle Analysis provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."