Verified Meta Data
Forretress vs Timburr: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Player 1
Forretress
Johto • Bug

Height1.2 m
Weight125.8 kg
VS
Player 2
Timburr
Unova • Fighting

Height0.6 m
Weight12.5 kg
Performance Statistics
Pokémon Attributes & Stats
4★
Character Rarity
Forretress
4★
Character Rarity
Timburr
Bug
Type
Forretress
Fighting
Type
Timburr
Johto
Region
Forretress
Unova
Region
Timburr
Head-to-Head Analysis
Forretress has a higher Base Stat Total (465), giving it a general attribute advantage. Timburr may rely on specific type matchups or speed tiers to counter.
Popular Variations (30)
Competitive Analysis: Forretress vs Timburr
In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Forretress and Timburr can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.📊 Stat Breakdown
Forretress brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Timburr. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is Forretress stronger than Timburr?
A: It depends on their roles. While Forretress has higher base stats in some areas, Timburr might have better type coverage or utility.
Q: What is the best type matchup for Forretress?
A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Forretress performs against different elements.
Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?
A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.
Explore More Tools
View All Tools →Bulbasaur vs Ivysaur: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Venusaur: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Charmander: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head