Verified Meta Data
Gastly vs Wobbuffet: Base Stats & Type Matchup icon

Gastly vs Wobbuffet: Base Stats & Type Matchup

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Player 1
Gastly
Kanto • Ghost
Gastly
Height1.3 m
Weight0.1 kg
VS
Player 2
Wobbuffet
Johto • Psychic
Wobbuffet
Height1.3 m
Weight28.5 kg

Performance Statistics

HP
30
190
Attack
35
33
Defense
30
58
Sp. Atk
100
33
Sp. Def
35
58
Speed
80
33
Total Stats
310
405

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

4★
Character Rarity
Gastly
4★
Character Rarity
Wobbuffet
🌀
Ghost
Type
Gastly
🌀
Psychic
Type
Wobbuffet
📍
Kanto
Region
Gastly
📍
Johto
Region
Wobbuffet

Head-to-Head Analysis

Wobbuffet features superior base scaling with a total of 405. Gastly depends on strategic type advantages and unique abilities.

Competitive Analysis: Gastly vs Wobbuffet

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Gastly and Wobbuffet can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Gastly brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Wobbuffet. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Gastly stronger than Wobbuffet?

A: It depends on their roles. While Gastly has higher base stats in some areas, Wobbuffet might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Gastly?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Gastly performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2027-04-03

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2026-11-06

"The Gastly vs Wobbuffet: Base Stats & Type Matchup provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."