Verified Meta Data
Jigglypuff vs Feraligatr: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Player 1
Jigglypuff
Kanto • Normal
Height0.5 m
Weight5.5 kg
VS
Player 2
Feraligatr
Johto • Water
Height2.3 m
Weight88.8 kg
Performance Statistics
Pokémon Attributes & Stats
4★
Character Rarity
Jigglypuff
4★
Character Rarity
Feraligatr
Normal
Type
Jigglypuff
Water
Type
Feraligatr
Kanto
Region
Jigglypuff
Johto
Region
Feraligatr
Head-to-Head Analysis
Feraligatr features superior base scaling with a total of 530. Jigglypuff depends on strategic type advantages and unique abilities.
Popular Variations (30)
Competitive Analysis: Jigglypuff vs Feraligatr
In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Jigglypuff and Feraligatr can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.📊 Stat Breakdown
Jigglypuff brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Feraligatr. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is Jigglypuff stronger than Feraligatr?
A: It depends on their roles. While Jigglypuff has higher base stats in some areas, Feraligatr might have better type coverage or utility.
Q: What is the best type matchup for Jigglypuff?
A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Jigglypuff performs against different elements.
Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?
A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.
Explore More Tools
View All Tools →Bulbasaur vs Ivysaur: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Venusaur: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Charmander: Base Stats & Type Matchup
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head