Jigglypuff vs Smoliv Battle Analysis
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Performance Statistics
Pokémon Attributes & Stats
Win Probability
Detailed Data Matrix
| Attribute | Jigglypuff | Smoliv |
|---|---|---|
| HP | 115 ▲ +74 | 41 |
| Attack | 45 ▲ +10 | 35 |
| Defense | 20 | 45 ▲ +25 |
| Sp. Atk | 45 | 58 ▲ +13 |
| Sp. Def | 25 | 51 ▲ +26 |
| Speed | 20 | 30 ▲ +10 |
| Total Stats | 270 ▲ +10 | 260 |
Head-to-Head Analysis
Popular Variations (10)
Competitive Analysis: Jigglypuff vs Smoliv
In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Jigglypuff and Smoliv can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.📊 Stat Breakdown
Jigglypuff brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Smoliv. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is Jigglypuff stronger than Smoliv?
A: It depends on their roles. While Jigglypuff has higher base stats in some areas, Smoliv might have better type coverage or utility.
Q: What is the best type matchup for Jigglypuff?
A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Jigglypuff performs against different elements.
Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?
A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.
Community Feedback
"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."
"The Jigglypuff vs Smoliv Battle Analysis provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."
Explore More Tools
View All Tools →Bulbasaur vs Ivysaur Battle Analysis
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Venusaur Battle Analysis
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Charmander Battle Analysis
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head