Verified Meta Data
Jynx vs Shroomish: Base Stats & Type Matchup icon

Jynx vs Shroomish: Base Stats & Type Matchup

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Player 1
Jynx
Kanto • Ice
Jynx
Height1.4 m
Weight40.6 kg
VS
Player 2
Shroomish
Hoenn • Grass
Shroomish
Height0.4 m
Weight4.5 kg

Performance Statistics

HP
65
60
Attack
50
40
Defense
35
60
Sp. Atk
115
40
Sp. Def
95
60
Speed
95
35
Total Stats
455
295

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

4★
Character Rarity
Jynx
4★
Character Rarity
Shroomish
🌀
Ice
Type
Jynx
🌀
Grass
Type
Shroomish
📍
Kanto
Region
Jynx
📍
Hoenn
Region
Shroomish

Head-to-Head Analysis

Jynx has a higher Base Stat Total (455), giving it a general attribute advantage. Shroomish may rely on specific type matchups or speed tiers to counter.

Competitive Analysis: Jynx vs Shroomish

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Jynx and Shroomish can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Jynx brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Shroomish. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Jynx stronger than Shroomish?

A: It depends on their roles. While Jynx has higher base stats in some areas, Shroomish might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Jynx?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Jynx performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2027-10-18

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2026-03-26

"The Jynx vs Shroomish: Base Stats & Type Matchup provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."