Verified Meta Data
Machoke vs Meltan: Base Stats & Type Matchup icon

Machoke vs Meltan: Base Stats & Type Matchup

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Player 1
Machoke
Kanto • Fighting
Machoke
Height1.5 m
Weight70.5 kg
VS
Player 2
Meltan
Alola • Steel
Meltan
Height0.2 m
Weight8 kg

Performance Statistics

HP
80
46
Attack
100
65
Defense
70
65
Sp. Atk
50
55
Sp. Def
60
35
Speed
45
34
Total Stats
405
300

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

4★
Character Rarity
Machoke
4★
Character Rarity
Meltan
🌀
Fighting
Type
Machoke
🌀
Steel
Type
Meltan
📍
Kanto
Region
Machoke
📍
Alola
Region
Meltan

Head-to-Head Analysis

Machoke has a higher Base Stat Total (405), giving it a general attribute advantage. Meltan may rely on specific type matchups or speed tiers to counter.

Competitive Analysis: Machoke vs Meltan

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Machoke and Meltan can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Machoke brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Meltan. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Machoke stronger than Meltan?

A: It depends on their roles. While Machoke has higher base stats in some areas, Meltan might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Machoke?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Machoke performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2026-10-04

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2027-09-21

"The Machoke vs Meltan: Base Stats & Type Matchup provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."