Verified Meta Data
Mankey vs Deerling: Base Stats & Type Matchup icon

Mankey vs Deerling: Base Stats & Type Matchup

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Player 1
Mankey
Kanto • Fighting
Mankey
Height0.5 m
Weight28 kg
VS
Player 2
Deerling
Unova • Normal
Deerling
Height0.6 m
Weight19.5 kg

Performance Statistics

HP
40
60
Attack
80
60
Defense
35
50
Sp. Atk
35
40
Sp. Def
45
50
Speed
70
75
Total Stats
305
335

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

4★
Character Rarity
Mankey
4★
Character Rarity
Deerling
🌀
Fighting
Type
Mankey
🌀
Normal
Type
Deerling
📍
Kanto
Region
Mankey
📍
Unova
Region
Deerling

Head-to-Head Analysis

Deerling features superior base scaling with a total of 335. Mankey depends on strategic type advantages and unique abilities.

Competitive Analysis: Mankey vs Deerling

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Mankey and Deerling can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Mankey brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Deerling. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Mankey stronger than Deerling?

A: It depends on their roles. While Mankey has higher base stats in some areas, Deerling might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Mankey?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Mankey performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2026-10-25

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2027-02-21

"The Mankey vs Deerling: Base Stats & Type Matchup provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."