Verified Meta Data
Metapod vs Escavalier: Base Stats & Type Matchup icon

Metapod vs Escavalier: Base Stats & Type Matchup

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Player 1
Metapod
Kanto • Bug
Metapod
Height0.7 m
Weight9.9 kg
VS
Player 2
Escavalier
Unova • Bug
Escavalier
Height1 m
Weight33 kg

Performance Statistics

HP
50
70
Attack
20
135
Defense
55
105
Sp. Atk
25
60
Sp. Def
25
105
Speed
30
20
Total Stats
205
495

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

4★
Character Rarity
Metapod
4★
Character Rarity
Escavalier
🌀
Bug
Type
Metapod
🌀
Bug
Type
Escavalier
📍
Kanto
Region
Metapod
📍
Unova
Region
Escavalier

Head-to-Head Analysis

Escavalier features superior base scaling with a total of 495. Metapod depends on strategic type advantages and unique abilities.

Competitive Analysis: Metapod vs Escavalier

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Metapod and Escavalier can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Metapod brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Escavalier. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Metapod stronger than Escavalier?

A: It depends on their roles. While Metapod has higher base stats in some areas, Escavalier might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Metapod?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Metapod performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2026-10-16

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2027-07-13

"The Metapod vs Escavalier: Base Stats & Type Matchup provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."