Verified Meta Data
Nidoking vs Mudsdale: Base Stats & Type Matchup icon

Nidoking vs Mudsdale: Base Stats & Type Matchup

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Player 1
Nidoking
Kanto • Poison
Nidoking
Height1.4 m
Weight62 kg
VS
Player 2
Mudsdale
Alola • Ground
Mudsdale
Height2.5 m
Weight920 kg

Performance Statistics

HP
81
100
Attack
102
125
Defense
77
100
Sp. Atk
85
55
Sp. Def
75
85
Speed
85
35
Total Stats
505
500

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

4★
Character Rarity
Nidoking
4★
Character Rarity
Mudsdale
🌀
Poison
Type
Nidoking
🌀
Ground
Type
Mudsdale
📍
Kanto
Region
Nidoking
📍
Alola
Region
Mudsdale

Head-to-Head Analysis

Nidoking has a higher Base Stat Total (505), giving it a general attribute advantage. Mudsdale may rely on specific type matchups or speed tiers to counter.

Competitive Analysis: Nidoking vs Mudsdale

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Nidoking and Mudsdale can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Nidoking brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Mudsdale. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Nidoking stronger than Mudsdale?

A: It depends on their roles. While Nidoking has higher base stats in some areas, Mudsdale might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Nidoking?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Nidoking performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2026-07-27

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2027-06-17

"The Nidoking vs Mudsdale: Base Stats & Type Matchup provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."