Verified Meta Data
Noctowl vs Fraxure: Base Stats & Type Matchup icon

Noctowl vs Fraxure: Base Stats & Type Matchup

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Player 1
Noctowl
Johto • Normal
Noctowl
Height1.6 m
Weight40.8 kg
VS
Player 2
Fraxure
Unova • Dragon
Fraxure
Height1 m
Weight36 kg

Performance Statistics

HP
100
66
Attack
50
117
Defense
50
70
Sp. Atk
86
40
Sp. Def
96
50
Speed
70
67
Total Stats
452
410

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

4★
Character Rarity
Noctowl
4★
Character Rarity
Fraxure
🌀
Normal
Type
Noctowl
🌀
Dragon
Type
Fraxure
📍
Johto
Region
Noctowl
📍
Unova
Region
Fraxure

Head-to-Head Analysis

Noctowl has a higher Base Stat Total (452), giving it a general attribute advantage. Fraxure may rely on specific type matchups or speed tiers to counter.

Competitive Analysis: Noctowl vs Fraxure

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Noctowl and Fraxure can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Noctowl brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Fraxure. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Noctowl stronger than Fraxure?

A: It depends on their roles. While Noctowl has higher base stats in some areas, Fraxure might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Noctowl?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Noctowl performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2026-02-25

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2027-02-12

"The Noctowl vs Fraxure: Base Stats & Type Matchup provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."