Verified Meta Data
Rattata vs Sylveon Battle Analysis icon

Rattata vs Sylveon Battle Analysis

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Performance Statistics

HP
30
95
Attack
56
65
Defense
35
65
Sp. Atk
25
110
Sp. Def
35
130
Speed
72
60
Total Stats
253
525

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

Rattata
4★
Character Rarity
🌀
Normal
Type
📍
Kanto
Region
Sylveon
4★
Character Rarity
🌀
Fairy
Type
📍
Kalos
Region
Battle Simulator v1.0

Win Probability

0%
100%
Rattata Win Rate
Sylveon Win Rate
Calculated based on base stats, type effectiveness, and 1,000 simulated battle rounds.

Detailed Data Matrix

AttributeRattataSylveon
HP30 95 ▲ +65
Attack56 65 ▲ +9
Defense35 65 ▲ +30
Sp. Atk25 110 ▲ +85
Sp. Def35 130 ▲ +95
Speed72 ▲ +1260
Type Matchup Bonus1.0x 1.0x
Effective Battle Power281580 ▲ +299
Total Stats253 525 ▲ +272

Head-to-Head Analysis

On paper, Sylveon (525) clearly outclasses Rattata (253) in overall attributes. Their speed tiers are incredibly close (72 vs 60), meaning the outcome often hinges on specific movesets rather than raw stats.

Competitive Analysis: Rattata vs Sylveon

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Rattata and Sylveon can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Rattata brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Sylveon. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Rattata stronger than Sylveon?

A: It depends on their roles. While Rattata has higher base stats in some areas, Sylveon might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Rattata?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Rattata performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.