Verified Meta Data
Sandslash vs Hatenna Battle Analysis icon

Sandslash vs Hatenna Battle Analysis

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Performance Statistics

HP
75
42
Attack
100
30
Defense
110
45
Sp. Atk
45
56
Sp. Def
55
53
Speed
65
39
Total Stats
450
265

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

Sandslash
4★
Character Rarity
🌀
Ground
Type
📍
Kanto
Region
Hatenna
4★
Character Rarity
🌀
Psychic
Type
📍
Galar
Region
Battle Simulator v1.0

Win Probability

100%
0%
Sandslash Win Rate
Hatenna Win Rate
Calculated based on base stats, type effectiveness, and 1,000 simulated battle rounds.

Head-to-Head Analysis

Sandslash has a higher Base Stat Total (450), giving it a general attribute advantage. Hatenna may rely on specific type matchups or speed tiers to counter.

Competitive Analysis: Sandslash vs Hatenna

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Sandslash and Hatenna can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Sandslash brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Hatenna. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Sandslash stronger than Hatenna?

A: It depends on their roles. While Sandslash has higher base stats in some areas, Hatenna might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Sandslash?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Sandslash performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2026-11-01

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2026-09-23

"The Sandslash vs Hatenna Battle Analysis provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."