Verified Meta Data
Shellder vs Sandy Shocks Battle Analysis icon

Shellder vs Sandy Shocks Battle Analysis

Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head

Performance Statistics

HP
30
85
Attack
65
81
Defense
100
97
Sp. Atk
45
121
Sp. Def
25
85
Speed
40
101
Total Stats
305
570

Pokémon Attributes & Stats

Shellder
4★
Character Rarity
🌀
Water
Type
📍
Kanto
Region
Sandy Shocks
4★
Character Rarity
🌀
Electric
Type
📍
Paldea
Region
Battle Simulator v1.0

Win Probability

0%
100%
Shellder Win Rate
Sandy Shocks Win Rate
Calculated based on base stats, type effectiveness, and 1,000 simulated battle rounds.

Head-to-Head Analysis

Sandy Shocks features superior base scaling with a total of 570. Shellder depends on strategic type advantages and unique abilities.

Competitive Analysis: Shellder vs Sandy Shocks

In the current PokeStats meta, choosing between Shellder and Sandy Shocks can define your climb in the competitive ladder. Our analysis breaks down their base stats to give you a clear advantage.

📊 Stat Breakdown

Shellder brings unique strengths to a team, especially when compared to Sandy Shocks. Whether you are looking for a fast sweeper or a bulky tank, understanding these base numbers is the first step to mastering the Poke-Verse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Shellder stronger than Sandy Shocks?

A: It depends on their roles. While Shellder has higher base stats in some areas, Sandy Shocks might have better type coverage or utility.

Q: What is the best type matchup for Shellder?

A: You can check the full type matrix in our Pokedex tools to see how Shellder performs against different elements.

Q: Are these stats updated for the latest generation?

A: Yes, our PokeStats database is synced with the latest Gen 9 data and current competitive metas.

Community Feedback

4.9/5 Average
C
Cynthia_Gamer VERIFIED
2027-04-27

"Perfect execution. The dark mode theme is very pleasing for late-night sessions."

B
Brandon_K VERIFIED
2027-06-09

"The Shellder vs Sandy Shocks Battle Analysis provided insights I had not considered before. A must-use."